<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TidalWare Blog &#187; web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tidalware.com/tag/web-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tidalware.com</link>
	<description>Behind the Scenes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of Web&#160;2.0</title>
		<link>http://blog.tidalware.com/2009/07/the-language-of-web-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tidalware.com/2009/07/the-language-of-web-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tidalware.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this so-called new age of web design, there appears to be an underlying trend in &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; websites. Something about it makes me cringe, because wherever you look, especially in websites showcasing portfolios or whatever, the language style is exactly the same. Informal speak, as if you&#8217;re talking to the visitor as a friend, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this so-called new age of web design, there appears to be an underlying trend in &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; websites. Something about it makes me cringe, because wherever you look, especially in websites showcasing portfolios or whatever, the language style is exactly the same. Informal speak, as if you&#8217;re talking to the visitor as a friend, I guess. To me, it&#8217;s pure cheese.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 22px; font-weight: bold;">HELLO. MY NAME IS BOB SMITH. I MAKE GOOD WEBSITES, AND STUFF.</span></p>
<p>You know what I&#8217;m talking about. The HUGE TEXT THEY USE TO SHOUT AT THE USER ON THE HOMEPAGE. Okay, so why? Well, you could argue it draws in the user&#8217;s attention, and that it instantly tells the user what the website is about. Fair enough. But I get bored when browsing CSS design showcases, only to find almost all of them follow this trend. Admittedly, even I fall victim to this nonsense. I get a feeling design showcases discriminate websites that don&#8217;t. Perhaps it&#8217;s just another internet phase.</p>
<p>My 5 minute browsing results:</p>
<p><a href="http://paiko.de/" target="_blank">http://paiko.de/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.baeck.no/" target="_blank">http://www.baeck.no/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.sergionoviello.com/" target="_blank">http://www.sergionoviello.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://nathan-sanders.com/" target="_blank">http://nathan-sanders.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.shannonmoeller.com/" target="_blank">http://www.shannonmoeller.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jamisonbanham.com/" target="_blank">http://www.jamisonbanham.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jasonreedwebdesign.com/" target="_blank">http://www.jasonreedwebdesign.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://sprawsm.com/" target="_blank">http://sprawsm.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.postmachina.com/" target="_blank">http://www.postmachina.com/</a></p>
<p>I could go on&#8230; Forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tidalware.com/2009/07/the-language-of-web-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
